Mitchell vs. wisconsin

Mitchell v. Wisconsin Why Mitchell v. Wisconsin Sucked On June 11, 1993, the United State Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin¹s penalty enhancement law, which imposes harsher sentences on criminals who ³intentionally select the person against whom the crime...is committed..because of the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry of that person.² Chief Justice Rehnquist deliverd the opinion of the unanimous Court. This paper argues against the decision, and will attempt to prove …showed first 75 words of 3422 total…

…showed last 75 words of 3422 total…v ------------------------------------------------------------------------ **Bibliography** Bibliography Cacas, Samuel. ³Hate Crime Sentences Can Now Be Enhanced Under A New Federal Law.² Human Rights 22 (1995): 32-33 Feingold, Stanley. ³Hate Crime Legislation Muzzles Free Speech.² The National Law Journal 15 (July 1, 1993): 6, 16 Gellman, Susan. ³Sticks And Stones.² UCLA Law Review 39 (December, 1991): 333-396 Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire R.A.V. v. St. Paul Texas v. Johnson U.S. v. O¹Brien Wisconsin v. Mitchell Wooley v. Maynard W.V. State Board of Education v